Research
Comfort in big numbers: Does over-estimation of doping prevalence in others indicate self-involvement?
-
* Corresponding author: Andrea Petróczi A.Petroczi@kingston.ac.uk
1 Kingston University, Faculty of Science, School of Life Sciences, Penrhyn Road, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, KT1 2EE, UK
2 The University of Sheffield, Department of Psychology, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK
3 School of Business, UNSW@ADFA, Australia
4 Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Measurement and Information Systems, Hungary
5 Carnegie Faculty of Sport and Education, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 2008, 3:19 doi:10.1186/1745-6673-3-19
Published: 5 September 2008Additional files
Additional File 1:
Direct doping estimate of others, Self reported doping behaviour, HDS and HDS-Self. The file shows the questions used for self-reporting and estimating doping behaviour directly and in hypothetical situations.
Format: DOC Size: 39KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 2:
Definition of nutritional supplements and doping. The file provides definitions for drug categories used in the questionnaire.
Format: DOC Size: 21KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer